leaders race

A fresh face has emerged in the race for the leadership of the national party, Mark Mitchell. This man has emerged out of nowhere to suddenly be a contender.
Anyone who has read the book "Dirty Politics" will recognize the name as one of our many MPs who pay Jordan Williams to manage firstly their selection and their public profile.
Should this man be selected he would owe Mr Williams a debt of gratitude.
Is it a happy coincidence that Mr Mitchell is receiving so much publicity at the moment or are the public and the media being manipulated by these behind the scenes personal coaches.

Go Nuts

Comments

  1. The Nutter19 February 2018 at 19:45

    of course if you had read dirty politics you would know that the person behind the slick PR of Mark Mitchel is in fact Simon Lusk , one of the well known rat pack from the far right

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Personal freedom

A couple of years ago a nz citizen that had been arrested in Australia for wanting to travel to Syria to join the conflict there. Every comment I have read or heard assumes that he was going to fight for Isis, has this been proven? For all we know he might have been going to help the moderates that are backed and armed by the USA to fight Isis. Does this new attack on personal movement include anyone wanting to travel overseas to help say Spain defend itself from Fascists as the international brigade so bravely tried to do in the 30s or to help  Britain and France  defend democracy in 1914 and again in 1940 or does it only apply to country’s that our government regard as the bad guys. There are ample examples of New Zealanders going to hot spots to help our friends with or without govt sanction, are we now being dictated too about where we can or cannot travel. Personal freedom was what we fought two world wars for and was a cornerstone of democracy sadly it appears what the
Read more

Cell Phone Law

The law banning the use of cell phones while driving is poorly drafted and needs to be challenged in court. While the intention may be admirable, after all who could argue against texting while driving especially if like me you need to look at what you are doing, this is obviously dangerous. However as this law now stands it is open to interpretation on what does it mean to use a cell phone while driving. Some police seem to think that if you are stationary at traffic lights or in  a gridlock situation  where no one is moving then the ban applies. This I find absurd. Also the phrase , to use your cell phone, logic would say the ban would only apply to  texting or calling but again some police believe that if you look at your phone to check the time, or even pick your phone up off the seat next to you and look at it before pocketing it then that constitutes using your cell phone. This may sound farfetched but it has happened to someone I know. Most people who get stung from this la
Read more